Advocates for Employees. Your Employment, Overtime + Minimum Wage Rights.
pdf article / full article from cleveland.com
By Alison Grant
Monday, April 11, 2011, 6:30 AM
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Bank loan officers, phone company engineers, exotic dancers, delivery truck drivers, exterminators, janitors and drug store assistant managers are among tens of thousands of U.S. workers who filed class action lawsuits against their employers last year.
They are part of a flood of wage and hour cases that reached record levels in 2010. Nearly 6,800 private-sector lawsuits were filed nationwide. In Northern Ohio, the number of cases was up 37 percent over the year before.
The Department of Labor, meanwhile, handled about 32,000 wage and hour complaints in 2010, a jump of 33 percent in just two years. And the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says pay and promotion cases are now the biggest category of employment discrimination filings.
"No question about it. There's been explosive growth in wage and hour complaints," said employer-side attorney James Stone, managing partner of the Cleveland office of the Jackson Lewis law firm.
Rising workplace disputes are fueled by layoffs and plant closings in a fragile economy. Stricter enforcement of wage and hour laws, and plaintiffs' lawyers pursuing new litigation strategies also figure in.
So does our swiftly morphing work world. Should call center workers be paid for boot-up and boot-down time on their computers? Should mortgage officers be paid for answering dozens of work emails after-hours on their BlackBerrys?
Gina Markosky became part of the statistics when she hired a lawyer to talk to her former employer, Akron Community Health Resources.
The Portage Lakes women said her tasks as a patient care coordinator required more time than she could squeeze into a 40-hour work week. So Markosky, 40, came in on Saturdays or worked evenings, and periodically filed for overtime.
Then the health clinic put her on a salary, with no overtime pay although her job demands were even bigger, she said. The health clinic did not return several calls seeking comment.
Wayne Brown, 41, of Willard said he ran into a similar situation at Pegasus Custom Car Coaches, a Sandusky producer of trailers for hauling race cars and horses.
After Brown's overtime hours mounted to 20 a week, the company changed the eight-year employee's pay to a salary.
"I was supposed to be a production foreman but I was actually a working production foreman. I still put the trailers together," said Brown, who lost his job in September.
An attorney for Pegasus Custom Car declined comment because the case is pending.
"Employers are seeking ways to avoid labor costs, and switching employees from hourly to salary is often the first mistake they make," said Anthony Lazzaro, who represents Markosky and Brown.
The Fair Labor Standards Act requires that employers pay the minimum wage, now $7.40 an hour in Ohio, and time-and-a-half for work over 40 hours a week. It was a sleepy statute, on the books since 1938, until a few years ago.
Stone, the employment attorney, said it's taken off in part because of an unintended consequence. Recent legislation to limit damage payments in medical malpractice cases has pushed plaintiffs' lawyers to look for new business in other areas of law, he said. Employment laws are both complex and somewhat ambiguous, Stone said, leaving companies open to claims they're breaking the rules.
Ellen Hoadley, whose firm Lexington Insurance Co. insures businesses against worker claims, recalled hearing one defense lawyer recently complain "For the plaintiffs bar, employment law is the new slip-and-fall."
Employee-side attorneys don't agree. Wage theft became rampant during years of non-enforcement by U.S. agencies, said Catherine Ruckelshaus, legal co-director of the National Employment Law Project, which advocates for low-wage workers.
"The employer community got pretty emboldened to feel like there's not going to be any risk if I just chisel workers," she said. "It became a way of doing business for a lot of job sectors."
Workers have become more educated about their rights, said Lazzaro, whose Cleveland firm filed about a third of the wage cases in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio between 2007 and 2009.
A 2009 undercover government investigation found the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division often pushed off callers by encouraging them to resolve issues themselves. The division directed most calls to voicemail, failed to return calls, and provided conflicting or misleading information on filing complaints, the investigation found.
The Obama administration responded by saying it would increase enforcement of wage and hour laws. It hired about 200 additional field investigators to tighten oversight.
Even so, the Department of Labor has more cases than it can handle. In December, it launched a program with the American Bar Association to help aggrieved workers find private-sector lawyers.
The Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association is one of 38 programs in 20 states collaborating on the Bridge to Justice program. (Call 216-696-3532.)
Wage and hour cases have yet to slow down, even as the economy is starting to improve, said Chicago attorney Gerald Maatman Jr., co-chair of the class action defense group at Seyfarth Shaw.
Store managers at AutoZone sued the parts supplier last year for "intentionally understaffing" its stores, leaving managers doing the work of full-time sales clerks for the bulk of work weeks that routinely stretched past 50 hours, without overtime pay.
A federal judge in December agreed to certify as a class action a lawsuit that could cover as many as 1,700 exotic dancers at Rick's Cabaret International. The dancers said they were wrongly classified as independent contractors, got no wages and had to earn all their money through tips.
Bank workers sued San Francisco-based Wells Fargo for allegedly requiring them to work off the clock on designated "call nights" without paying overtime.
But the most-watched recent U.S. case was the gender-bias class action suit against Walmart Stores Inc., now before the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices heard oral arguments in the case March 29.
The lawsuit says 1.5 million current and former female workers at Walmart received pay and promotions that lagged their male counterparts'. Walmart denies discrimination and says that millions of separate personnel decisions made by store managers can't be clumped into the common pattern of treatment needed for a class action.
The massive volume of paper in the case, with supporters weighing in on both sides, is evidence it may be the most important employment lawsuit in decades, Maatman said.
"The stakes in the case are enormous," he said, "and the future ruling is likely to be transformative for class action litigation."
Start Wage Theft Survey
Copyright The Lazzaro Law Firm, LLC. All Rights Reserved